I keep about 8-10 pdf's in the system. Some Aurautus,leucs and tincs. I don't worry about breeding as their is no hope for Tads to develop with the stingrays present.
Please, and this applies to the great many people in the hobby who speak English, look up the definition of "tropical", because you are wrong. "Tropical" is a latitude, not a climate or environment. Anywhere in Central America is, by definition, tropical, regardless of whether it is desert, coral reef, swamp, or glacier. Widespread misuse of the term does not change its correct definition.
Also I agree with punctata. I remembered reading somewhere that PDFs piggyback their young to pools. And if the pools dry they carry them elsewhere. So if you have bromeliads or other water holding areas you have a possibilty of lil PDFs running amuck. Not bad at allI think you are wrong about no breeding going to happen. Some of the tads will survive. The Parents will also transport them around to new plants or "pool" cites.
You're right - but you miss the point - two in fact. First,the alternate definitions of "tropical" all derive from the root one, which is essentially latitudinally based, and are comparative not definitive. That is, we describe things as "tropical" because they resemble what we stereotypically perceive as being the nature of the tropics [even though that stereotype is incomplete and to some extent inaccurate], but we do so in a comparative manner [ie, "tropical heat", "it seemed tropical"; but not "tropical forests of Oregon"]. Because of that, we have the second point, which is that you CANNOT state that *** is not "tropical" when it DOES in fact meet at least one definition of the word. For that matter, the primary definition. Any place in the tropics is "tropical", regardless of whether it adheres to our stereotyped views of the tropics. Any place outside of the tropics is NOT tropical, although it may comparatively seem so.Regards to your definition here. That is only one use of the word tropical...
No, it was NOT correct, because the argument was that salamanders of the tropics are not tropical - when by definition they absolutely are. This is less a matter of definition than of logic. In order to be excluded from accepted definitions, something must be excluded from ALL such definitions. Tropical salamanders meet at least one definition, and in some cases all of them.Yes one could argue that point infinitely, but when used currently it has to do with the biotype of the area. Yes it was derived from the latitudes between the tropics, but it does not matter in current uses, the way kaysie used it was correct under current uses of the word.