Rupert
New member
- Joined
- May 25, 2015
- Messages
- 87
- Reaction score
- 4
- Points
- 0
- Location
- Seoul
- Country
- South Korea
- Display Name
- Rupert
First of all, I apologize for the provocative title- I am not trying to question the necessity nor the importance of good quarantine practice.
However I am curious if simple quarantine methods described in the CC article(Caudata Culture Articles - Quarantine and Disinfection) can really prevent the introduction of potentially aquarium-wiping diseases.
The standard practice is a month long quarantine to see if the animal is sick or stressed.
However, does the lengthy quarantine period do anything to bacteria/virus/fungus that are not fatal to the host but just waiting to be spread in the newly introduced tank?
Serious fishkeepers use a bunch of medication in their quarantine tank for new arrivals to rid of any disease transmission via methylene blue and furan-2. This hopefully kills any parasites/bacteria/fungi that may be tagging on the new individual.
However I have not yet seen any article that suggests such practice on caudates.
This could mean 2 things;
a) Potential risk of liberal medication is much worse than the risk of pathogen introduction as long as the new individual seems relatively healthy;
or
b) As long as the new individual does not show any symptoms of diseases/bacteria/fungi/parasites during the quarantine period, it can be assumed that the new individual is free of all these harmful things.
However, I don't think that bacteria or virus just die out in a quarantine environment without any medical/chemical intervention. Maybe they can be reduced, but there is always a chance that there could be a pathogen harmless to the new individual which could prove fatal for the inhabitants of my established tank.
I had a colleague who lost a whole tank of Neurergus Crocatus after introducing another Neurergus Crocatus, albeit from a different source. All the newts started dropping dead in a matter of days, which points to a deadly disease introduction. There was no substantial quarantine period(which is partly the keeper's negligence), but then again, would 4 weeks of quarantine really remove the dangers of the pathogen?
I guess in most cases the new individual would show the symptoms in a time period of a month, but what if the new individual has resistance to that certain pathogen while the tankmates do not? Doesn't it spell doom on a luck's whim?
I was hoping if I could get some insight on the matter, especially whether if I should medicate/disinfect any new individual that is to be introduced into an already populated tank as a part of quarantine procedure.
And if broad-spectrum medication is to be used during the quarantine procedure, what medications/dosages would you recommend?
Thanks for your time.
However I am curious if simple quarantine methods described in the CC article(Caudata Culture Articles - Quarantine and Disinfection) can really prevent the introduction of potentially aquarium-wiping diseases.
The standard practice is a month long quarantine to see if the animal is sick or stressed.
However, does the lengthy quarantine period do anything to bacteria/virus/fungus that are not fatal to the host but just waiting to be spread in the newly introduced tank?
Serious fishkeepers use a bunch of medication in their quarantine tank for new arrivals to rid of any disease transmission via methylene blue and furan-2. This hopefully kills any parasites/bacteria/fungi that may be tagging on the new individual.
However I have not yet seen any article that suggests such practice on caudates.
This could mean 2 things;
a) Potential risk of liberal medication is much worse than the risk of pathogen introduction as long as the new individual seems relatively healthy;
or
b) As long as the new individual does not show any symptoms of diseases/bacteria/fungi/parasites during the quarantine period, it can be assumed that the new individual is free of all these harmful things.
However, I don't think that bacteria or virus just die out in a quarantine environment without any medical/chemical intervention. Maybe they can be reduced, but there is always a chance that there could be a pathogen harmless to the new individual which could prove fatal for the inhabitants of my established tank.
I had a colleague who lost a whole tank of Neurergus Crocatus after introducing another Neurergus Crocatus, albeit from a different source. All the newts started dropping dead in a matter of days, which points to a deadly disease introduction. There was no substantial quarantine period(which is partly the keeper's negligence), but then again, would 4 weeks of quarantine really remove the dangers of the pathogen?
I guess in most cases the new individual would show the symptoms in a time period of a month, but what if the new individual has resistance to that certain pathogen while the tankmates do not? Doesn't it spell doom on a luck's whim?
I was hoping if I could get some insight on the matter, especially whether if I should medicate/disinfect any new individual that is to be introduced into an already populated tank as a part of quarantine procedure.
And if broad-spectrum medication is to be used during the quarantine procedure, what medications/dosages would you recommend?
Thanks for your time.