J
jennifer
Guest
In a previous thread, we were discussing the fact that some batches of captive-bred M. alpestris seem to be predominantly females.
http://www.caudata.org/forum/messages/13/68688.html?1159721583
I have a new discovery that might be an explanation for this.
First, the history...
Last year (fall/winter/spring) I kept a large tank with 11 alpestris apuanus. They were a combination of 2:2 second-year animals, and 7 "unknown" first-year offspring. Throughout the breeding season, all 7 of the younger animals were "female". At least SOME of the first-year females produced eggs.
This summer, I sold 5 of the young "females", and kept 2. I also acquired 2 additional 1-year-old "females" from another source. I moved these 4 animals to their own tank.
Here are current photos of my 4 "females":
Clearly 2 of them are male, and there is a third one that may also be male. (Anyone want to make bets on the sex of #4?)
There are two explanations that I can think of. First, perhaps SOME males require longer to develop. Second, perhaps the presence of a stronger male(s) somehow suppresses the development of breeding characteristics in young males.
What people have observed in groups of CB offspring is that one or two of them develop very quickly into males, and all the rest look female. People think they are able to sex them at this point. But really, maybe there are additional "hidden" males among the ones that still look female.
(Message edited by jennewt on October 12, 2006)
http://www.caudata.org/forum/messages/13/68688.html?1159721583
I have a new discovery that might be an explanation for this.
First, the history...
Last year (fall/winter/spring) I kept a large tank with 11 alpestris apuanus. They were a combination of 2:2 second-year animals, and 7 "unknown" first-year offspring. Throughout the breeding season, all 7 of the younger animals were "female". At least SOME of the first-year females produced eggs.
This summer, I sold 5 of the young "females", and kept 2. I also acquired 2 additional 1-year-old "females" from another source. I moved these 4 animals to their own tank.
Here are current photos of my 4 "females":
Clearly 2 of them are male, and there is a third one that may also be male. (Anyone want to make bets on the sex of #4?)
There are two explanations that I can think of. First, perhaps SOME males require longer to develop. Second, perhaps the presence of a stronger male(s) somehow suppresses the development of breeding characteristics in young males.
What people have observed in groups of CB offspring is that one or two of them develop very quickly into males, and all the rest look female. People think they are able to sex them at this point. But really, maybe there are additional "hidden" males among the ones that still look female.
(Message edited by jennewt on October 12, 2006)