Laotriton article

michael

2010 Research Grant Donor
Joined
Apr 12, 2003
Messages
3,423
Reaction score
168
Points
63
Location
Ephrata,Pa
Country
United States
Display Name
Michael Shrom
In this article Stuart claims that shortly after Paramesotriton laoensis was described Germans and Japanese used his local info to illegally collect them. He also tells about the first Laotriton he saw in an alcohol bottle brought back from a wedding celebration. It is an interesting article. It does not speak well of hobbyists keeping Laotriton. It doesn't look like anything bad was said about using them for food.

The dark side of new species discovery
 
Last edited:
Aye, I have read a few versions of the mass media articles. As is usual, people tend to write about things they just can't comprehend. The trend is to spout misinformation based on the reports of other mass media sources.
 
I liked this article a lot. The problem is large commercial collections, which apparently are now done by local people because there are international buyers for the critters. I can see how that is a real dilemma for rare species with a small distribution. Tightening local laws may help (a bit), but as long as people pay big bucks for wild-caught animals, there'll always be someone willing to collect them from the wild.

If you read the last paragraph of the article, you'll see that this scientist is not at all against keeping herps as pets - on the contrary, he is very encouraging of the educational and awareness-raising benefits of keeping species that have been captive-bred and not collected in the wild. Hopefully now that the Lao newt is bred in captivity, it will eliminate the temptation for anyone to catch them in the wild.
 
Dr. Stuart has told this story and stated similar concerns before [notably in the paper he refers to here], but this version is also interesting and more informative in some ways. The story of collectors descending on Laotriton and on Goniurosaurus luii [and Excidobates mysteriosus, Ranitomeya sirensis, Excidobates captivus, etc] is not a new one - by definition it's a decade old at this point. He contacted me in 2003 [May 14 - I still have the email], expressing surprise at Laotriton being in the pet trade, although this was based on miscommunication. I suspect that photos I received of preserved specimens prior to their description [email January 26, 2002] led to this, although it was certainly true that they WERE in the trade by then, just not to me! His concerns are obviously valid. I have been able to use published information, mainly when 'exploring' didn't work, to track animals to within feet of where they are known to occur - generally NOT to collect, and certainly not commercially.

What I found MOST interesting though, is the existence of a thesis specifically on Laotriton, which likely contains much more detailed biological data, plus additional work on Lao caudates. There are likely at least a half dozen species of salamander in Laos, mainly tylos, but of three or four genera in total. I expect these to be Tylototriton shanjing, T. cf. shanjing, T.asperrimus, T.cf.vietnamensis, T.vietnamensis, T.notialis, and Laotriton. A Paramesotriton sp., perhaps Hypselotriton sp., and a Pachytriton sp. [a single record in Vietnam, and the sister genus of Laotriton] are possible as well, but less likely. I'm still collecting and reviewing locality and taxonomic data for all of these species, to work out their correct current localities and likely additional occurences.
 
General chit-chat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
    Chat Bot: Kepuchie has left the room. +1
    Back
    Top