Petersgirl
New member
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2013
- Messages
- 965
- Reaction score
- 20
- Points
- 0
- Country
- United Kingdom
I recently found out that my spawning male and female are direct brother and sister. I didn't know this until after their eggs had been laid and I had been raising the eggs. I got them from another owner who had to move them on, who mentioned they came from a breeder in a local city. I only knew of one breeder in that city and I contacted her. She said they looked like a batch she had raised and that they were from the same batch, so they are brother and sister. I had assumed they were from different batches.
So my question is: is it okay to raise eggs knowing that the parents are inbred? I spoke to a man at a local zoo who specialises in newts and salamanders (he will be taking 15 of my babies) and he says that it takes 20 generations before we see the impacts of inbreeding. I know ideally we should avoid cross-matings between close relatives, but do you think it is unethical to let the babies grow up on the condition that you let people who take them on know they are the offspring of an inbred mating? I just have strong feelings against the same kind of breeding in dogs, say, even though I know it does happen (I am also aware that a lot of the captive axolotl population has a lot of shared genes).
So my question is: is it okay to raise eggs knowing that the parents are inbred? I spoke to a man at a local zoo who specialises in newts and salamanders (he will be taking 15 of my babies) and he says that it takes 20 generations before we see the impacts of inbreeding. I know ideally we should avoid cross-matings between close relatives, but do you think it is unethical to let the babies grow up on the condition that you let people who take them on know they are the offspring of an inbred mating? I just have strong feelings against the same kind of breeding in dogs, say, even though I know it does happen (I am also aware that a lot of the captive axolotl population has a lot of shared genes).