Hi Jen.
As for the back foot thing, this behavior has also been recorded with the "Atsumi race" of
C. pyrrhogaster (which may now be extinct). I've just now e-mailed you a photo of this
I meant to point this out before, but while recently editing thread titles for species name accuracy, I took the liberty of changing the title of one of your threads to "C. pyrrhogaster metamorphs: Kanto vs. Sasayama" because you had "Sasayame" written there too. Somebody correct me if I'm wrong, but the scientific name given when it was thought this newt could be a distinct subspecies was
Cynops pyrrhogaster sasayamae -- "Sasayama" being a geographical name as is "Kanto" (Sasayama is a town in Hyogo Prefecture, while Kanto is the name of a vast plain that includes Tokyo). My understanding is that "e" is added onto the end of a geographical name (or a female personal name?), and "i" is added to a male personal name (as in the case of
Hynobius dunni named after Dunn or
Cynops ensicauda popei named after Pope). So I think one should refer to these newts either as "Sasayama�@
pyrrhogaster" or to "
C. p. sasayamae". In the scientific papers I have, it is indeed referred to as the Sasayama race. Have you by any chance seen it anywhere referred to as Sasayame?
As far as background goes, it was previously assumed, on the basis of morphology, that the Sasayama race was a distinct subspecies, but electrophoretic data has since shown that it's very close genetically to adjacent populations of "Hiroshima race"
C. pyrrhogaster. In contrast, those
C. pyrrhogaster from southern Kyushu that had been lumped together with newts from a wide area of Japan as "Hiroshima race"
pyrrhogaster have been shown to be comparatively much more distinct genetically from all other
C. p. populations. There are a number of examples of this also in Japanese hynobiids, namely animals looking different morphologically but being genetically close, and those looking similar morphologically but being genetically distant.
(Message edited by tj on November 21, 2005)